• Patient Registration
  • Scheduling & Pathways
  • Queue Management
  • Patient Apps
  • Wayfinding
  • Informed Consent
  • Audit & Evidence
  • Compliance Monitoring
  • IoT & Devices
  • Patient Identity
  • Data Residency
  • Clinical Dashboards

Trusted by

  • logo ny SMALL
  • fc logo 750 1000x186
  • Invaryant Logo 2022 rectangle 1 1000x400
  • Kids mobile app 2 1000x638
  • 2560px Logo Centrum Zdrowia Dziecka 1000x874
  • sani nudge logo
Engineering since
1992
Technical specialists
200+
European countries
6
Quality management
ISO 9001

The healthcare problems that don't fit a standard product

  • The first visit

    The heaviest paperwork handled by the people least familiar with the process, at the desk.

  • Patient identity

    Clinical, administrative and device systems each identifying the same person differently.

  • Proxy and delegated access

    Parents, carers and legal representatives acting for someone else, on a defined basis.

  • Consent as evidence

    Which version was shown, to whom, when — answerable as a query rather than a file search.

  • Large sites

    Many buildings and entrances, where visitors generate constant questions staff should not answer.

  • Observer effect

    Compliance sampled by a person on the ward, which changes the behaviour being measured.

  • Data residency

    Where health data may be stored, decided per category and enforced rather than documented.

  • Alert fatigue

    Thresholds that clinicians must be able to tune without waiting for a software release.

  • Custom clinical logic

    Pathways and rules specific to a service that no product will ship out of the box.

Don’t see your challenge here? Talk to us about your project

Nothing we build should become another place the record lives

Healthcare systems succeed by feeding the tools clinicians already use. A separate dashboard adds a place to look rather than information, which is why identity resolution and integration are the first design tasks rather than the last.

Hospital information systems
Patients, episodes, appointments and results.
National health registries
Identity, eligibility and statutory reporting.
Scheduling systems
Resources, rooms, staff and pathway sequencing.
Laboratory systems
Orders and results, released under clinical policy.
Medical devices
Sensor estates, telemetry and firmware management.
Identity providers
National eID, bank authentication and SSO.
Document and consent archives
Versioned documents with immutable audit.
Analytics and research
Consented, de-identified extracts with residency respected.

Healthcare platforms we have delivered

Swipe to see all four projects.

  • Patient registration: Moving intake ahead of arrival

    Registration built so the desk confirms rather than collects — with patient identity, data protection and integration with the systems already holding the record as the real constraints, and the change measurable in the waiting room.

    Hospital · Pre-arrival intake

  • Sani Nudge: Continuous hygiene compliance monitoring

    Hygiene compliance measured passively and continuously, with a nudge at the moment of the missed action rather than a report weeks later. A sensor fleet and an event pipeline — with the reporting model deciding whether it is used or resented.

    Infection control · Sensor monitoring

  • Fertility consent: Consent where the evidence has to last

    What was explained, to whom, in which wording and with whose agreement, provable long after the fact and often involving more than one consenting party. The audit trail was the product; signature capture was a detail.

    Specialist clinic · Informed consent

  • Kids: A mobile app for a paediatric hospital and its families

    Built for parents navigating an unfamiliar and stressful environment, where what mattered most was not clinical — it was knowing where to go, what would happen and when.

    Paediatric hospital · Patient & family app

Care settings we understand

Health software carries the rules of the setting it serves. These are the environments whose constraints we have already had to build for.

  • Hospitals

    Large multi-building sites, wards, pathways and visitor flow.

  • Paediatrics

    Families as primary users, proxy access and plain language.

  • Fertility & specialist clinics

    Multi-party consent with evidence that has to last.

  • Infection control

    Continuous hygiene measurement and behavioural nudging.

  • Primary care

    Registration, scheduling and high-volume routine contact.

  • Health technology

    Device platforms, telemetry and data-driven products.

  • Research organisations

    Consented data, retention rules and reproducibility.

  • Education & training

    Learning platforms for clinical and support staff.

Trusted by European enterprises since 1992

Microsoft Partner since 1998. ISO 9001:2015 certified quality management.

30+ years of engineering
Software development since 1992 — from traditional enterprise systems to composable, headless commerce.
Proven client base
Serving enterprises across Scandinavia, the Baltics, Central Europe and the US.
6-country European presence
Offices in Estonia, Denmark, Norway, Poland, Switzerland and Spain.
200+ technical specialists
Developers, analysts, architects and project managers across multiple technologies.
Deep tech stack knowledge
.NET, Java, Node.js, React, Next.js, Vue.js, Angular, Python and the major cloud platforms.
European regulatory expertise
Direct experience with GDPR, EU accessibility rules, e-invoicing and emerging AI legislation.

From first analysis to long-term operation

  1. Clinical and service analysis

    Understand the pathway as it is actually walked, where the queue forms, and what the regulatory position requires — because residency and consent rules shape the whole architecture.

    You getA written picture of today and tomorrow, with the problems ranked by business impact.

  2. Architecture & roadmap

    Identity resolution and integration contracts designed first, then a phased plan starting with the highest-volume, lowest-risk relief.

    You getA phase-one scope and estimate, agreed before any build starts.

  3. Build & integrate

    Iterative delivery with clinical staff in the loop, integration built alongside features, and a staged, rehearsed go-live on a live service.

    You getWorking software running on your own data from the first weeks, shown in regular demos. No mock-ups.

  4. Operate & evolve

    Monitoring, alert tuning, consent and compliance reporting, and a roadmap that keeps pace with how the service actually changes.

    You getMonitoring, alert tuning and a roadmap we keep together as the service changes.

How we deliver — not what we sell

We are platform-agnostic by conviction rather than by slogan. In healthcare that matters more than usual: the systems already holding the record rarely move, so what we build has to fit around them rather than ask them to change.

Patient-facing applications are built in Next.js or React, with native mobile where wayfinding, notifications or poor indoor signal justify its ongoing cost — and we say when they do not.

Device and sensor work runs on event pipelines designed for estates that lose connectivity and reconnect with a backlog, with ordering and deduplication handled explicitly rather than hopefully.

Behind it we work across Node.js, .NET and Java, with hosting and data residency chosen to meet the regulatory position established at the start — including in-country hosting where health data rules demand it.

Key questions answered

Do you integrate with our hospital information system?

Yes — that is the premise. Nothing we build becomes another place patient data lives; it feeds the system that already holds the record, and we design the identity matching so a pre-arrival form attaches to the right patient.

Is electronic consent legally sufficient?

In the European countries we work in, yes, when the identity assurance and audit trail meet the relevant standard. Requirements vary by country and procedure, and we design to the strictest one in scope.

Where is the data stored?

Wherever your regulatory position requires, including in-country hosting where health data residency rules demand it. That constraint is established at the start because it shapes the whole architecture.

Will staff accept being monitored?

That depends on governance, not technology. Team-level rather than individual reporting, clear access limits and involving clinical staff in the design are what determine acceptance — and we resolve that before deployment, not after.

Can you work on a live service?

Yes. Staged rollout, rehearsed go-live and a working fallback are how we deliver into settings that cannot stop. We would rather move in smaller slices than ask a ward to absorb a big change at once.

Let's talk about your healthcare platform

Tell us where the friction sits in the pathway today and what the regulatory position requires. We will come back with an honest read on the integration work, the identity problem underneath it, and what a realistic first phase looks like.

Rando Siimon Profile Image

Rando Siimon

Business Development Manager