Operations planning & delivery engineering
We design, build, integrate and operate planning systems — production and tender planning, workforce, cost and quality reporting, fleet and assets — built around the ERP your business already runs on.
- Production Planning
- Capacity Modelling
- Scenario Planning
- Tender Management
- Order Pipeline
- Delivery Date Calculation
- Skills & Qualifications
- Shift & Rota Planning
- Time & Attendance
- Job Costing
- Quality & Non-Conformance
- Fleet & Assets
Trusted by
- Engineering since
- 1992
- Technical specialists
- 200+
- European countries
- 6
- Quality management
- ISO 9001
What we do
Six services covering how work is planned, promised, carried out and paid for — the systems that usually live in a spreadsheet until they cannot any more.
Operations platform development
Custom planning and management systems for manufacturers and asset-heavy businesses whose process no ERP module has ever fitted.
Read moreProduction planning
Capacity, skills, shifts and machine availability modelled as data, with the constraints made explicit.
Read moreTender and order management
RFPs, tenders and orders in one pipeline, with committed load visible at the moment a date is promised.
Read moreWorkforce and worktime
Qualification tracking, rotas and time capture at the point the work happens rather than from memory.
Read moreCost and quality reporting
Hours, materials and inspections per job, reported while there is still time to act on them.
Read moreFleet and asset management
Vehicles and equipment tracked from acquisition through maintenance to remarketing, with every step visible.
Read more
The operational problems that don't fit a standard module
The planning spreadsheet
Accurate the day it is made, owned by one person, and stale within the week.
Capacity that is not real
Setup and changeover time quietly omitted, making a plan that cannot be met.
Dates promised blind
Delivery dates given on a general sense of how busy the factory is.
Qualifications in one head
Who may do what, known informally and unavailable during absence.
Costs reconciled too late
Overruns discovered weeks after the job rather than corrected during it.
Assets nobody can find
Establishing where a vehicle is and what state it is in taking phone calls.
Re-entry between systems
Orders retyped into production, where specification detail is lost.
Shop-floor interfaces
Software designed for a desk, used with gloves, in noise and dirt.
Custom operational logic
Constraints and rules specific to a plant that no product will ship.
Don’t see your challenge here? Talk to us about your project
Planning is only as good as what it is checked against
Operational systems generally work best alongside the ERP rather than instead of it — reading master data and orders, writing back commitments. Replacing an ERP to improve planning is rarely proportionate to the problem.
- ERP
- Master data, orders, materials and postings.
- MES and machines
- Actual output, downtime and changeover from the floor.
- CRM
- Opportunities and quotations linked to real capacity.
- Payroll
- Clean attendance and time data handed over, not duplicated.
- Procurement & suppliers
- Material availability and lead times checked against the plan.
- Telematics
- Mileage and usage feeding maintenance scheduling.
- Quality systems
- Inspections, non-conformance and traceability.
- Finance & reporting
- Job-level cost posted in the dimensions finance reports on.
Operational platforms we have delivered
Swipe to see all four projects.
Manufacturing: Planning and management of the manufacturing process
A unified project management system supporting production planning, connecting parts of the process that had previously been coordinated by hand — so capacity and commitments became visible in one place.
ABB: Centralised enterprise planning software for a factory
Tender preparation, order management and production planning brought into one place, so a delivery date could be set against actual committed load and the sales side and the factory worked from the same numbers.
Athlon: A web-based fleet management application
Remarketing managers needed every vehicle findable in a few clicks with each step of the process visible. Getting the register and the workflow trustworthy first is what made the reporting straightforward.
Facit: A web application for operational data capture
Recording what happens where it happens, so the figures reaching management describe the work rather than someone's reconstruction of it at the end of the week.
Industries we understand
Operational software carries the constraints of the floor it serves. These are the settings whose constraints we have already had to model.
Manufacturing
Capacity, changeovers, bottlenecks and job-level cost.
Industrial equipment
Tenders, engineered orders and long delivery pipelines.
Construction
Sites, subcontractors, qualifications and progress capture.
Fleet & leasing
Lifecycle, maintenance, utilisation and remarketing.
Energy & utilities
Field work, assets and scheduled maintenance.
Logistics
Resources, routes and per-shipment cost visibility.
Facilities & services
Rotas, skills coverage and compliance reporting.
Public infrastructure
Asset registers, inspections and statutory records.
Trusted by European enterprises since 1992
Microsoft Partner since 1998. ISO 9001:2015 certified quality management.
- 30+ years of engineering
- Software development since 1992 — from traditional enterprise systems to composable, headless commerce.
- Proven client base
- Serving enterprises across Scandinavia, the Baltics, Central Europe and the US.
- 6-country European presence
- Offices in Estonia, Denmark, Norway, Poland, Switzerland and Spain.
- 200+ technical specialists
- Developers, analysts, architects and project managers across multiple technologies.
- Deep tech stack knowledge
- .NET, Java, Node.js, React, Next.js, Vue.js, Angular, Python and the major cloud platforms.
- European regulatory expertise
- Direct experience with GDPR, EU accessibility rules, e-invoicing and emerging AI legislation.
From first analysis to long-term operation
Floor analysis
Walk the process as it is actually run, find the constraint that genuinely governs throughput, and record the changeover times the spreadsheet leaves out.
You getA written picture of today and tomorrow, with the problems ranked by business impact.
Model & roadmap
Model capacity, skills and availability, then a phased plan with a first release that makes one routine planning operation take seconds rather than an afternoon.
You getA phase-one scope and estimate, agreed before any build starts.
Build & integrate
Iterative delivery with planners and supervisors in the loop, integration to the ERP built alongside features, and shop-floor capture designed for gloves and noise.
You getWorking software running on your own data from the first weeks, shown in regular demos. No mock-ups.
Operate & evolve
Tuning the capacity model against what actually happened, extending coverage, and a roadmap that follows the plant rather than leading it.
You getMonitoring, a capacity model tuned against what actually happened, and a roadmap we keep together.
How we deliver — not what we sell
We are platform-agnostic by conviction rather than by slogan. In operations that usually means building alongside the ERP you already run: reading its master data, writing back commitments, and leaving it to do what it does well.
Planning interfaces are built for the operations that happen dozens of times a day — moving a job, adding a shift, testing a rush order — because if those take longer than the spreadsheet did, the spreadsheet wins.
Shop-floor capture runs on fixed terminals, badge readers or mobile devices, chosen for the environment rather than for convenience. The constraint is gloves, noise and dirt, not software.
Behind it we work across .NET, Java and Node.js, with event-driven integration to ERP and machine systems and reporting that posts job-level cost in the structure finance already reports on.
Key questions answered
Do we need to replace our ERP?
Generally not. Planning usually works best as a system alongside the ERP, reading master data and orders and writing back commitments. Replacing an ERP to improve planning is rarely proportionate to the problem.
How accurate does the capacity model need to be?
Accurate enough to be trusted, which is a lower bar than perfect. We start with the constraint resources and the changeover times, since those drive most of the error, and refine from there.
Will planners use it instead of the spreadsheet?
Only if it is faster for them. The common operations have to take seconds, and that is the main thing we design around — a planning tool that is slower than a spreadsheet loses to the spreadsheet every time.
Does this need new hardware on the floor?
Sometimes, and we say so up front. Where terminals or scanners are needed that is a real cost, and we scope it explicitly rather than assuming existing devices will do.
Can it feed our financial reporting?
Yes. Job-level cost data posts to the accounting system in the structure finance reports on, so operational and financial figures reconcile instead of needing an explanation of why they differ.
Let's talk about your operations
Tell us which spreadsheet is currently holding the plan together and where delivery dates come from today. We will come back with an honest read on the capacity model, the ERP integration involved, and what a realistic first phase looks like.
