Cost and quality reporting
Hours, materials and quality per job reported while there is still time to act — instead of reconciled afterwards, when a project that went wrong is discovered rather than corrected.
What job-level reporting requires
Cost tracking per job
Hours and materials attributed to the job as they are consumed, which is the only way a margin figure arrives early enough to change anything.
Material and consumption recording
Capture at the point of use, designed for the actual working environment rather than for someone sitting at a desk afterwards.
Quality control and inspections
Inspection results recorded against the job and the batch, with the evidence attached rather than filed separately.
Non-conformance handling
Deviations raised, routed and closed with root cause recorded, so the pattern across jobs becomes visible.
Margin reporting while work runs
Position against estimate during the job, which turns a post-mortem into an intervention.
Audit and compliance reporting
Traceability from finished item back to materials, operators and inspections, produced on demand.
Don’t see your challenge here? Talk to us about your project
Reconciling after the job means discovering it rather than correcting it
Where hours and materials are reconciled after completion, cost overruns are found weeks later. The information is accurate and useless: the job is finished, the margin is spent, and the only remaining action is explanation.
Capturing at the source moves that forward by weeks and changes what the number is for. It also improves accuracy, because recording consumption as it happens is more reliable than reconstructing it afterwards.
- Captured at source
- Recorded as consumed, not reconstructed.
- In-flight margin
- Position against estimate while work continues.
- Evidence attached
- Inspection results held against the job.
- Root cause tracked
- Patterns visible across jobs, not per incident.
- Traceable
- Finished item back to materials and operators.
- Built for the floor
- Interfaces designed for gloves, noise and dirt.
Cost and quality visible while the manufacturing work is still running
Bringing cost tracking into the same platform as production planning meant hours and materials could be attributed to a job as it ran rather than reconciled afterwards. Once margin is visible in flight, a job heading in the wrong direction becomes something a manager can act on rather than something a report describes.
Common questions
Does this need new hardware on the shop floor?
Sometimes, and we say so up front. Where terminals or scanners are needed, that is a real cost and we scope it explicitly rather than assuming existing devices will be adequate.
How accurate is operator-recorded time?
Accurate enough to be useful, provided recording takes seconds and does not interrupt the work. Where it is slow or awkward it will be batched at the end of a shift, and the timing benefit disappears.
Can this feed our financial reporting?
Yes. Job-level cost data posts to the accounting system in the structure finance reports on, so operational and financial figures reconcile instead of requiring an explanation of why they differ.
Let's talk about your operations
Tell us which spreadsheet is currently holding the plan together and where delivery dates come from today. We will come back with an honest read on the capacity model, the ERP integration involved, and what a realistic first phase looks like.
